<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Glow on Lanturn Weekly</title>
    <link>https://lanturnweekly.com/tags/glow/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Glow on Lanturn Weekly</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 03:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://lanturnweekly.com/tags/glow/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Lanturn Glow: The Quiet Side of AI</title>
      <link>https://lanturnweekly.com/posts/2026-03-05-glow/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 03:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lanturnweekly.com/posts/2026-03-05-glow/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;ve followed AI news at all in the past year, you&amp;rsquo;ve probably developed a specific feeling about it. Maybe it&amp;rsquo;s anxiety about jobs disappearing. Maybe it&amp;rsquo;s frustration at chatbots confidently making things up. Maybe it&amp;rsquo;s unease about deepfakes and misinformation. All of those concerns are legitimate. But they&amp;rsquo;ve also crowded out a different kind of AI story — the kind where a researcher points a machine-learning model at a genuinely hard scientific problem and gets an answer that would have taken humans decades to find on their own.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
